首页> 外文OA文献 >Post-intervention effects on screen behaviours and mediating effect of parental regulation: The HEalth In Adolescents study – a multi-component school-based randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Post-intervention effects on screen behaviours and mediating effect of parental regulation: The HEalth In Adolescents study – a multi-component school-based randomized controlled trial

机译:干预后对屏幕行为的影响以及父母监管的中介效应:青少年健康问题研究 - 一项基于学校的多学科随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: To improve effectiveness of future screen behaviour interventions, one needs to know whether an intervention works via the proposed mediating mechanisms and whether the intervention is equally effective among subgroups. Parental regulation is identified as a consistent correlate of screen behaviours, but prospective evidence as well as the mediation role of parental regulation is largely lacking. This study investigated post-intervention main effects on screen behaviours in the HEIA-intervention – a Norwegian school-based multiple-behaviour study, as well as mediation effects of parental regulation by adolescents’ and parents’ report. In addition, moderating effects of gender and weight status on the intervention and mediating effects were explored. Methods: Participating schools were randomized to control (n = 25) or intervention (n = 12) condition. Adolescents (n = 908 Control; 510 Intervention) self-reported their weekday and weekend TV-viewing and computer/game-use. Change in adolescents’ behaviours was targeted through school and parents. Adolescents, mothers (n = 591 Control; 244 Interventions) and fathers (n = 469 Control; 199 Intervention) reported parental regulation of the screen behaviours post-intervention (at 20 month). The product-of-coefficient test using linear regression analysis was conducted to examine main and mediating effects. Results: There was no intervention effect on the screen behaviours in the total sample. Gender moderated effect on weekend computer/game-use, while weight status moderated the effect on weekday TV-viewing and computer/game-use. Stratified analyses showed a small favourable intervention effect on weekday TV-viewing among the normal weight. Parental regulation did not mediate change in the screen behaviours. However, stronger parental regulation was associated with less TV-viewing and computer/game-use with effects being conditional on adolescents’ versus parental reports. Parental regulation of the screen behaviours, primarily by the parental report, was associated with change in the respective behaviours. Conclusion: Multiple behaviour intervention may not affect all equally well, and the effect may differ by weight status and gender. In future interventions parents should be encouraged to regulate their adolescents’ TV-viewing and computer/game-use on both weekdays and weekends as parental regulation was identified as a determinant of these screen behaviours. However, future intervention studies may need to search for more effective intervention strategies targeting parental regulation.
机译:背景:为了提高未来的屏幕行为干预的有效性,人们需要知道干预是否通过建议的中介机制起作用,并且该干预在各亚组之间是否同样有效。父母的监管被确定为筛查行为的一致相关因素,但在很大程度上缺乏前瞻性证据以及父母监管的中介作用。这项研究调查了干预后对HEIA干预中屏幕行为的主要影响(这是一项基于挪威学校的多行为研究,以及青少年和父母的报告对父母的调节的中介作用)。此外,还探讨了性别和体重状况对干预和调节作用的调节作用。方法:将参与学校随机分为对照组(n = 25)或干预(n = 12)。青少年(n = 908控制; 510干预)自我报告了他们平日和周末的电视观看情况以及计算机/游戏的使用情况。青少年行为的改变是通过学校和父母进行的。青少年,母亲(n == 591对照; 244项干预措施)和父亲(n == 469对照; 199项干预措施)报告了干预后(20个月时)父母对筛查行为的调节。使用线性回归分析进行了系数乘积检验,以检验主要效应和中介效应。结果:总样本中的屏幕行为没有干预效果。性别减轻了对周末计算机/游戏使用的影响,而体重状态减轻了对平日电视观看和计算机/游戏使用的影响。分层分析显示,正常体重人群对平日看电视的干预作用较小。父母的规定并未调解屏幕行为的变化。但是,更严格的父母监管与较少的电视观看和计算机/游戏使用相关,其影响取决于青少年与父母的报告。父母对屏幕行为的调节,主要是由父母的报告,与各自行为的改变有关。结论:多种行为干预可能不会对所有人都产生相同的效果,并且其影响可能因体重状况和性别而异。在未来的干预措施中,应鼓励父母在工作日和周末对青少年的电视观看以及计算机/游戏的使用进行规范,因为父母的规范被确定为这些屏幕行为的决定因素。但是,未来的干预研究可能需要寻找针对父母监管的更有效的干预策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号